---
description: Joseph Cammarata analyzes how corporate profit motives in healthcare can override patient care, discussing legal accountability for medical institutions that prioritize reimbursement over patient dignity.
title: Profits Before Patients: When Corporate Decisions Override Patient Care - Chaikin, Sherman, Cammarata & Siegel, P.C.
---
Profits Before Patients: When Corporate Decisions Override Patient Care - Chaikin, Sherman, Cammarata & Siegel, P.C.
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
	

			
			

		
		

		
				
			
					
		
		
		
				
				
									
					
						
									Back to CSCS In The News
					
					
				
								
				
				
				
					In The News Article				
				
				
				
				
					
				
		
					
				
				
					
[Home](https://www.chaikinandsherman.com/) » Profits Before Patients: When Corporate Decisions Override Patient Care
				
				
					
				
		
					
		
				
				
																														
				
				
				
					
# Profits Before Patients: When Corporate Decisions Override Patient Care
				
				
				
				
					

## When Hospitals Choose Profits Over Patient Dignity: Legal Accountability Matters

Joseph Cammarata, partner at Chaikin Sherman Cammarata & Siegel, provides critical legal analysis in Healthcare Risk Management on a troubling case where hospital decisions appear motivated by profit rather than patient welfare. A transplant patient was kept alive artificially despite a devastating prognosis, apparently because survival statistics affect the hospital’s reimbursement rates and ability to continue its transplant program. Cammarata is direct: “They’ve put profits over patients. They’ve lost their way.” The hospital informed the family their loved one was alive, giving false hope of recovery, when in reality the institution was artificially maintaining life to improve its survival statistics—benefiting the hospital’s bottom line, not the patient’s dignity or prognosis.

The case raises fundamental questions about medical ethics and institutional accountability. Cammarata emphasizes that the hospital took away the patient’s right to a dignified death and deceived the family in the process. “The conduct that they’ve engaged in shouldn’t be tolerated in a civilized society, and they should be severely punished,” he states. The root problem is systemic: survival statistics that count artificially sustained life as “survival” incentivize hospitals to keep patients on machines regardless of prognosis or quality of life. Legal professionals play a crucial role in holding institutions accountable when corporate profit motives override the physician’s oath to act in the patient’s best interest. Read the full analysis.

				
				
				
				
							
			
						
		
						
				
				
				
							

								
													
							Categories: 
										
				[Legal Updates](https://www.chaikinandsherman.com/blog/news-categories/legal-updates/), [Media Appearance](https://www.chaikinandsherman.com/blog/news-categories/media/)				
					
								
				
													
							Attorneys Involved: 
										
				[Joseph Cammarata](https://www.chaikinandsherman.com/blog/attorney/joseph-cammarata/)				
					
								
				
													
							Practice Areas:
										
				[Medical Malpractice](https://www.chaikinandsherman.com/blog/practice-area/medical-malpractice/)				
					
								
				

						
				
				
		
		
				
				
					
## [Profits Before Patients, Betrayal of Trust: When Corporate Decisions Override Patient Care](https://www.clinician.com/articles/profits-before-patients-betrayal-of-trust)
				
				
				
				
							

							
											
													
										Greg Freeman, Healthcare Risk Management
									
								
											
													
										January 1, 2025
									
								
											
													
										Clinician (Healthcare Risk Management)
									
						

						
				
				
				
									Joseph Cammarata, partner at Chaikin Sherman Cammarata & Siegel, provides legal commentary on a case where a hospital’s focus on survival statistics—which affect reimbursement and transplant program continuation—may have overridden patient-centered care. The case involves a transplant patient kept alive artificially despite devastating prognosis, raising critical questions about when hospitals prioritize profit over dignified patient outcomes. Cammarata emphasizes that such conduct “shouldn’t be tolerated in a civilized society” and that legal accountability is essential.								
				
				
				
									
					
						
									Read Whole Article
					
					
				
								
				
				
				
					
				
		
					
		
		
				
				
							
							
																											
													
									
					
						
				
				
				
					
## Get free advice about the compensation you deserve.
				
				
				
				
									
At Chaikin, Sherman, Cammarata & Siegel, P.C., our car accident attorneys fight tirelessly to secure the compensation you deserve, handling every aspect of your case to protect your rights. Trust us to stand by you and advocate aggressively on your behalf.
								
				
				
		
				
				
								
		        
                
                        
							
"*" indicates required fields

                        
                        Name*
                            
                            
                                                    
                                                    First
                                                
                            
                            
                            
                        Last Name*
                            
                            
                            
                            
                                                    
                                                    Last
                                                
                            
                        Email**
                            
                        Phone*Are you a new client?*Are you a new client? *Yes, I'm a potential new client.No, I'm a current existing client.I'm neitherCase TypeCase TypeMotor Vehicle AccidentSlip & FallAssaultMedical MalpracticeAbuseWork InjuryOtherWere You at Fault?Were You At Fault?NoYesUnknownWhere Did The Incident Occur?Where Did The Incident Occur?Washington, D.C.VirginiaMarylandOtherDid The Accident Occur In the Last Two Years?Did The Accident Occur In the Last Two Years?YesNoShare Brief Description of the Incident*