Previous Posts
- The Purpose and Scope of the NFL Players Associati...
- Partners Ira Sherman and Joseph Cammarata attend t...
- Partners Siegel and Cammarata are Name as "Top Law...
- The NFL Players Association announces the formatio...
- Whistleblower Files Suit Against Johnson & Johnson...
- November 10, 2009 Edition Of The Washington Post C...
- CSCS Posts Notice In The Washington Law Reporter O...
- Never Give A Statement To An Insurance Company Wit...
- A Lawyer's Top Ten
- CSCS Lawyers Attend Inaugural Law Fair For High Sc...
Archives
- March 2007
- April 2007
- May 2007
- June 2007
- July 2007
- August 2007
- September 2007
- October 2007
- November 2007
- December 2007
- February 2008
- March 2008
- April 2008
- May 2008
- June 2008
- July 2008
- August 2008
- September 2008
- October 2008
- November 2008
- December 2008
- January 2009
- February 2009
- March 2009
- April 2009
- May 2009
- June 2009
- July 2009
- August 2009
- September 2009
- October 2009
- November 2009
- December 2009
Washington DC Personal Injury Lawyer Blog | Chaikin, Sherman, Cammarata, & Siegel P.C.
Wednesday, October 31, 2007
CSCS Gets a Double Victory in a Case against the District of Columbia- Part II
The law firm of Chaikin, Sherman, Cammarata & Siegel, P.C. successfully negotiated with the District of Columbia, who has finally agreed to forgo its claim to recover $2.5 million in money spent to care for Mr. Frank Harris, Jr. from the proceeds of the settlement of the case brought on behalf of Mr. Harris by the law firm of Chaikin, Sherman, Cammarata & Siegel, P.C. Although Mr. Harris has no reasonable likelihood of being released from St. Elizabeth’s Hospital at any time during his lifetime (he has already been in St. Elizabeth’s for approximately 34 years) lawyers, Ira Sherman and Joseph Cammarata were successful in negotiating a payment to Mr. Harris of $650,000 which will be placed in a “Special Needs Trust” to provide services supplementary to those which the District of Columbia will provide for his care. His guardian, Ms. Janice Motley, is hopeful that the money can benefit Mr. Harris by paying for “field trips” to places such as to the zoo and the provide a one-on-one teacher.
posted by Biera Campbell at 2:30 PM
Monday, October 29, 2007
CSCS Gets a Double Victory in a Case Against the District of Columbia- Part I
We have previously reported about the case of Frank Harris, Jr., an individual who was institutionalized at St. Elizabeth’s Hospital because he was found not guilty of a minor property crime, by reason of insanity. Although it might seem harsh that an individual could be placed in a mental institution for over thirty years over a minor property crime, the law does permit an individual to be retained in the care, custody, control of the District of Columbia if they are found guilty by reason of insanity unless and until the judge finds that they have been “cured”. Mr. Harris had been complaining that bad demons were “invading” through his eyes and that he needed to tear his eyes out. Numerous medical records reported the necessity of protecting Mr. Harris from tearing his eyes out. Despite the fact that the records stated that Mr. Harris needed that protection, the District of Columbia assigned an individual to Mr. Harris who was not adequately familiar with Mr. Harris’ condition. He released Mr. Harris without adequate protection, e.g. hand mitts, and Mr. Harris immediately tore both of his eyes out.
Shortly after filing the lawsuit on behalf of Mr. Harris, the District of Columbia sent the guardian representing Mr. Harris a bill for over $2.2 million for the “care” provided to him during his institutionalization. There was a public outcry against the District of Columbia for attempting to recover the cost of “caring” for Mr. Harris from monies it would pay to compensate Mr. Harris for negligently permitting him to tear his eyes out. Initially it was only the Washington Post that wrote an editorial “Blind Injustice” which aligned itself with the viewpoint of Ira Sherman, Esq. and Joseph Cammarata, Esq., the partners at Chaikin, Sherman, Cammarata & Siegel, P.C. that were representing Mr. Harris. Within a matter of weeks, City Councilmember At-Large, Phillip Mendelson and City Council Chairman Vincent Gray agreed with Messrs. Sherman and Cammarata and wrote Mayor Fenty a letter requesting that he withdraw the bill sent to the guardian because it was unfair and inappropriate. The Mayor seemed unaffected by the public outcry and the outcry within the city council. Council members Mendelson and Gray successfully lobbied other members of the District of Columbia city council to support the introduction of legislation to cure the unfair actions of the Mayor and his staff of lawyers. Eleven of thirteen council members co-authored and introduced the “Frank Harris, Jr. Offset Justice Amendment Act of 2007”.
In summary, the bill, a copy of which is appended to this blog, would prohibit the District of Columbia from seeking recovery of money expended to care for Mr. Harris from the proceeds of monies provided to Mr. Harris resulting from the negligence of his care. We are proud of the success of this collective effort.
/Frank%20Harris%20Jr.%20Offset%20Amendment%20Act%20of%202007-1.pdf
Shortly after filing the lawsuit on behalf of Mr. Harris, the District of Columbia sent the guardian representing Mr. Harris a bill for over $2.2 million for the “care” provided to him during his institutionalization. There was a public outcry against the District of Columbia for attempting to recover the cost of “caring” for Mr. Harris from monies it would pay to compensate Mr. Harris for negligently permitting him to tear his eyes out. Initially it was only the Washington Post that wrote an editorial “Blind Injustice” which aligned itself with the viewpoint of Ira Sherman, Esq. and Joseph Cammarata, Esq., the partners at Chaikin, Sherman, Cammarata & Siegel, P.C. that were representing Mr. Harris. Within a matter of weeks, City Councilmember At-Large, Phillip Mendelson and City Council Chairman Vincent Gray agreed with Messrs. Sherman and Cammarata and wrote Mayor Fenty a letter requesting that he withdraw the bill sent to the guardian because it was unfair and inappropriate. The Mayor seemed unaffected by the public outcry and the outcry within the city council. Council members Mendelson and Gray successfully lobbied other members of the District of Columbia city council to support the introduction of legislation to cure the unfair actions of the Mayor and his staff of lawyers. Eleven of thirteen council members co-authored and introduced the “Frank Harris, Jr. Offset Justice Amendment Act of 2007”.
In summary, the bill, a copy of which is appended to this blog, would prohibit the District of Columbia from seeking recovery of money expended to care for Mr. Harris from the proceeds of monies provided to Mr. Harris resulting from the negligence of his care. We are proud of the success of this collective effort.
/Frank%20Harris%20Jr.%20Offset%20Amendment%20Act%20of%202007-1.pdf
posted by Biera Campbell at 3:34 PM
